Translate

Search This Blog

Sunday, 16 April 2023

Blavatsky and William Stainton Moses

From The Key to Theosophy, chapter 9:
'ENQUIRER. But "M. A. Oxon" (pen-name of William Stainton Moses) is a Spiritualist?
THEOSOPHIST. Quite so, and the only true Spiritualist I know of, though we may still disagree with him on many a minor question. Apart from this, no Spiritualist comes nearer to the occult truths than he does. Like any one of us he speaks incessantly "of the surface dangers that beset the ill-equipped, feather-headed muddler with the occult, who crosses the threshold without counting the cost."  Our only disagreement rests in the question of "Spirit Identity." Otherwise, I, for one, coincide almost entirely with him, and accept the three propositions he embodied in his address of July, 1884. It is this eminent Spiritualist, rather, who disagrees with us, not we with him.'
The relationship between Theosophy and spiritualism (beside Blavatsky's distinction between mediumship and mediatorship) is complicated by the strong possibility that the adepts associated with the movement were also using similar means to communicate with certain people, such as William Stainton Moses, Mabel Collins, Anna Kingsford, and Laura Holloway. How does one distinguish between possible adept communications and the average spiritualistic fare? One way would be to examine the writings in question and ascertain if their teachings have a consistency among them. According to H. P. Blavatsky: 'The tree is known by its fruits; and as all Theosophists have to be judged by their deeds and not by what they write or say, so all Theosophical books must be accepted on their merits, and not according to any claim to authority which they may put forward.' (Key to Theosophy, ch. 14)
There was a time when Spirit Teachings by William Stainton Moses was considered to be the 'Bible' of spiritualism. In its time, it had a considerable influence on the alternative spiritual movement, but it seems to have gone out of style and been replaced by more modern teachings. His original notebooks are still the prized possession of the psychic research organization that he founded.
Here is what Henry Olcott has written regarding the identity of +Imperator and his band of loyal associates (Old Diary Leaves I, chap. 20):
“It is now clear to me that one directing Intelligence, pursuing a wide-reaching plan covering all nations and peoples, and acting through many agents besides ourselves, had in hand his development and mine, his body of psychical proofs and those given me by and through H. P. B. Who “Imperator,” its agent, was, I know not–I do not even know who H. P. B. really was—but I have always been inclined to believe that he was either S. M.’s own Higher Self or an adept; and that “Magus” and others of S. M.’s band were adepts likewise. I had my band also—though not of “spirit controls.” S. M. had an Arabian teacher, so had I; he an Italian philosopher, so had I; he had Egyptians, I had a Copt; he had a “Prudens,” “versed in Alexandrian and Indian lore,” so had I—several; he had Dr. Dee, an English mystic, I also had one—the one previously spoken of as “the Platonist;” and between his phenomena and H. P. B.’s there was a striking re-semblance.” (p.320)
“In view of all the above (i.e., the facts and arguments given in the original version of this and the preceding chapter), am I far wrong in suspecting a close connection between the Intelligence behind Stainton Moses and that behind H.P.B.?” (p. 323)

See what Mr. Sinnett’s esteemed correspondent had to say about the identity of this mysterious +Imperator and his relation to Blavatsky (from Mahatma Letters 9):

Here’s an intriguing description of Imperator’s band of indefatigable agents. Notice the conspicuous sevenfold organizational structure:
I, myself, Imperator Servus Dei, am the chief of a band of forty-nine spirits, the presiding and controlling spirit, under whose guidance and direction the others work. I am come from the seventh sphere to work out the will of the Almighty ; and, when my work is complete, I shall return to those spheres of bliss from which none return again to earth. But this will not be till the medium’s work on earth is finished, and his mission on earth exchanged for a wider one in the spheres.
Under me is my deputy and lieutenant, Rector, whose business it is to superintend in my absence, and especially to control the band of physical manifesting spirits. Associated with him is a third high spirit, who is the inspiring spirit, Doctor, the Teacher. He guides the medium’s thoughts, influences his words, directs his pen. Under his general superintendence there are the spirits of wisdom and knowledge, to be hereafter described.
Next come the guardians whose are it is to ward off and modify the baneful influences of earth, to drive away the hurtful, temper the painful, to shed around an influence. The inward yielding to evil can alone destroy their power.
Yet again, there are two guardians whose care it is to ward off the evil influences of the spheres, the allurement of the lower spirits who would draw the medium from his allotted work and divert him from his sacred mission. These four guardians are my personal attendants, and these complete the first circle of seven, the whole band being divided into seven circles of seven spirits; each circle composed of one presiding spirit with six ministers.
The first circle is composed entirely of guardians and inspiring spirits (7)spirits whose mission is general and concerned with the supervision of the whole band.
The next circle of seven spirits is devoted to the care of love–spirits of love. Religion, love to God; charity, love to man; gentleness, tenderness, pity, mercy, friendship, affection (6); all these are in their charge. They minister to the affections, inspire feelings of gentleness and mercy; love to God, the Universal Father; love to man, the common brother; tenderness for all who grieve; pity for all who suffer; desire to benefit and help all.
Next comes a circle–one presiding, with six spirit ministers–of wisdom. Under their care is intuition, perception, reflection, impression, reasoning and the like (5). They preside over the intuitive faculties and the deductions made from observable facts. They inspire the medium with the spirit of wisdom and drive away influences fallacious and misguiding. They plant intuitive wisdom.
Next in order is a circle which presides over knowledge–of men, of things, of life, whose charge is caution and comparison, of causality and eventuality, and the like (4)They guide the medium’s steps through the tortuous paths of earth-life, and lead him to practical knowledge, complement to the intuitive wisdom, of what is beneficial and profitable.
To these kindred groups, wisdom and knowledge–which are under the general supervision of Doctor, the inspiring Teacher–succeed: A circle who preside over art, science, literature, culture, refinement, poetry, paintings, music, language (3). They inspire the thought with that which is noble and intellectual, and lead to words of refinement and sublimity. They incline to that which is beautiful, artistic, refined and cultured; which gives the poetic touches to the character and elevates and ennobles it.
Next comes a circle of seven who have charge of mirth, wit, humour, geniality and joyous conversation (2). These give the lighter touches to the character, the sparkling, bright side, which is attractive in social intercourse, which enlivens the word spoken or written with flashes of wit, and relieves the somber dullness of daily toil. They are spirits attractive and genial, kindly and lovable.
Last of all come the spirits who have charge of the physical manifestations (1), which it is thought right at present to associate with the higher message. This circle is composed principally of spirits on their probation under the guardianship of Rector, lieutenant of the band. It is his care to teach them and to allow them, by association with the medium and his circle, to advance from a lower to a higher sphere. These are spirits who from divers causes are earthbound, and who, by the manifestations which they are permitted to work out, are purifying and elevating themselves.
So you see the band divides itself into seven groups, each with its peculiar charge. Spirits of love, of wisdom and knowledge; spirits refined and noble; spirits bright and genial, who shed a ray of that light which is not of your earth on the drudgery of existence in a lower sphere; spirits whose privilege it is to progress from an inferior grade to one higher and nobler through association with you, to whom such manifestations as they furnish are yet necessary.
In all these various circles there are spirits who are progressing, who are giving experience and enlightenment, who are living the medium’s life, and mounting upward as he mounts; learning as they teach, and soaring as they raise him to their sphere. It is a labour of love, this guardianship of ours, a labour which brings its own reward, and blesses us, even as we bestow blessings upon the medium and, through him, upon mankind. May the Almighty Father bless you.” More Spirit Teachings, pp. 4-5
Leslie Price gives some more details (See Mystery #5 Who was Imperator?):
Madame Blavatsky and the Seven Archival Mysteries - part two
Leslie Price, 15 March 2015
http://www.theosophyforward.com/theosophy/1408-madame-blavatsky-and…
There’s actually an astral photograph of one of +Imperator’s esteemed agents with Moses, taken by the spirit photographer, Aksakov. The following explains the process of that circumstance:
(There are several such photographs available on the internet. I could have included them, but since we are now in a period of strong skepticism regarding spiritualist manifestations, and because the agents in question are not as glamorous and flamboyant as the modern 'ascended masters' portrayals, I fear that these images would be disappointing to many.)
His spirit photographed in Paris.
S. M. writes in Light of a letter received from a French gentleman concerning the spirit photography of his sister and other relatives during their sleep in America, the photo being taken by Buguet in Paris.
Mentally, the Frenchman had asked his sister for her family’s picture; and on one plate she was there with three girls, and on the other with two boys. Another time she, in answer to his request, brought her mother, who was living miles away from her. There were also messages written on a card which she holds in the photo.
As a result, S. M. arranged to have a photo of a friend taken in Paris on a Sunday morning at 11 o’clock, hoping to be there in spirit. He awoke late, heard church bells, then became unconscious till 11.47. The experiment was successful. On the second exposure there was a perfect likeness of S. M.,with eyes closed as in sleep. Also, on the plate, was an old man, a sage well-known to him as one of his band, Prudens (Plotinus).
At a subsequent seance Imperator said that the medium’s spirit had been carefully entranced, and was then transported by its guides from London to Paris, the cord which unites body and soul being extended from one city to the other. More Spirit Teachings, p. 66
Video Lecture: 
The Ghost Club lecture society set up in 1882 by William Stainton Moses & A. A. Watts, William Crookes members & guests Conan Doyle, W. B. Yeats, Sir Harry Johnstone, Sir William Richmond, Arthur Lillie Charles Massey, A. P. Sinnett Dr. Stanhope Speer
A Spirit Explains Ectoplasm  15 August 2022
In the February 1905 issue of “The Annals of Psychical Science,” Ernest Bozzano, an Italian psychical researcher, offers an article titled “A Defence of William Stainton Moses.” whitecrowbooks.com/michaeltymn/en

 
 

Saturday, 8 April 2023

Blavatsky on Satan and Lucifer

 Satan and Lucifer – Her views on Satan and Lucifer were situated in a social current of Luciferiansim and still get noticed by various more fundamentalist Christians; below some of the major pieces on this controversial topic. Blavatsky does not worship the devil, she is rather cautious about questions of ritual and worship and she does not support any form of idolatry, sacrilege, profanation, desecration, blasphemy, or immorality. She considers the popular understanding  of the devil to be a superstition, and she makes a distinction between what are known as Satan and Lucifer. Her writings are situated within a current of theological debates of the time, spurred by a greater critical approach and historical research. Her basic approach to the question is to challenge the anthropomorphic, literal, superstitious, and dogmatic approaches in favour of considering the question in a more philosophical, theological inquiry into the nature of good and evil and theodicy

This is an area where the debate has changed. Christians no longer engage in intricate theological defence as in Blavatsky's day. They have more or less acquiesced to the  skeptical, rationalist, modern approach and accept the historical temporality of textual and social history. Realizing perhaps that there is little solid testimonies for the first fifty years of Christianity, they can safely posit that there's little about the origins of Christianity that can be proved or disproved, therefore no one can totally discount their traditions, faiths and beliefs. Consequently, there is little interest in doing a historiographical survey of those debates, for example of the reception of an important text that Blavatsky used, which made an enormous impact, went through many printings, and has been largely forgotten, Supernatural Religion: An Inquiry Into The Reality Of Divine Revelation, 1874, Walter Richard Cassels.
 
Regarding an oft-posted Blavatsky quote on the Interwebs,  “It is Satan who is the god of our planet and the only god…”? Well, it's from SD2, 234 theosociety.org/pasadena/sd/sd She' s paraphrasing & commenting on Anna Kingsford's intriguing text, The Secret of Satan sacred-texts.com/wmn/cws/cws71.
an intriguing mystical Origen-type universal salvation theology text. At worst, the quote is supporting Origenist universal salvation. If one wishes to condemn her for that, fine, otherwise, I think that the use of the quote is misleading.

1- She devotes a full chapter in Isis Unveiled, vol. 2 to an intricate theological research into the question of the existence of Satan. One of her most erudite, focused and sustained pieces of historical research.

Chapter 10 – The Origin and History of the Dogma of Satan 

(The Devil-Myth)

1- Eternal Damnation / Christian Missionaries (473)

2-Dogma of the existence of Satan (476)

3- Biblical Passages (480)

4- Serpent-Dragon Pagan Sources (482)

5- Job (493)

6- Demons / Church History (500)

7- Avatars (503)

8- Sun and Dragon Myths / Hell (506)

9- Descent into Hell / Gospel of Nicodemus (514)

10- Israelites and Saturn (523)

11- Judaism and Christian Theology (525)

12- Bacchus (527)

https://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/isis/iu2-10a.htm

 

2-What’s in a Name?
Lucifer, Vol. I, No. 1, September, 1887, pp. 1-7] Collected Writings vol. 9, pp. 5-13
This with the next article, explains the reasons for the magazines controversial title and gives very erudite and esoteric explanations for the connection of Lucifer with the planet Venus.
 
3- History of a planet [Lucifer, Vol. I, No. 1, September, 1887, pp. 15-22] Collected Writings vol. 9, pp. 14-27
 

4- The Fall of Ideals

[Lucifer, Vol. V, No. 28, December, 1889, pp. 261-274] Blavatsky Collected Writings vol.12, pp. 33-52

A good succinct exposition of her ideas on Satan and Lucifer based on commentary of a Victor Hugo poem.'he is the ideal synthesis of all discordant forces & each separate human vice or passion is but an atom of his totality.' CW 12, 51, The Fall of Ideals [Lucifer, Dec., 1889, p. 274]

http://www.katinkahesselink.net/blavatsky/articles/v12/y1889_079.htm

 

5- Her major esoteric, theological, cosmological exposition: 

The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 2, part 2, Chap. 18. XVIII. On the Myth of the “Fallen Angel,” in its Various Aspects,  pp. 475-505

Academic study:

Satanic Feminism: Lucifer as the Liberator of Woman in Nineteenth-Century Culture, Per Faxneld, 2017

a more recent book that has similar arguments and research to the Isis Unveiled chapter, more accessible:

Elaine Pagels (1995) The Origin of Satan NY: Vintage Books 
 
PS - sound bite on Satan/Lucifer- 'he is the ideal synthesis of all discordant forces & each separate human vice or passion is but an atom of his totality.' CW 12, 51, The Fall of Ideals [Lucifer, Dec., 1889, p. 274] Victor Hugo poem comm

Thursday, 6 April 2023

Blavatsky on Christianity

Blavatsky is sometimes perceived as being ‘anti-Christian’, or because of later neo-theosophical developments, of being a heterodox Christian. Whatever the case may be, the fact is that she has a considerable body of writings of Christian critiques (which if studied, may be found to have been quite prescient and constructive) as well as on early Christian history, Jewish and Christian Gnosticism and comparative studies of esoteric and pagan aspects of Christianity to her credit.

Blavatsky was a critic of the first Vatican council and made various allegations about corruption in the Jesuit order of her time. The Christian College Magazine was published by a Scottish Protestant missionary organization and ran a slanderous piece on Blavatsky. René Guénon's anti-theosophy essay 'Théosophisme' was edited by Catholic philosopher Jacques Maritain. The Vatican issued a report on the New Age movement with conceptual, conjectural, discursive, interpretative, theoretical speculations about Blavatsky which were inaccurate, contrived, and unproven. Also, their report on the condemnation of esoteric philosopher Giordano Bruno was unsatisfactory to me, although better than nothing, I guess. Therefore, there are some tensions between the theosophical movement and Christian institutions to say the least.

However, did not the Second Vatican Council implement many of the critiques contained in Blavatsky's writings on Christianity? Has this not created a division between conservative and progressive Catholics? So when a man undertakes to promote theosophical concerns such as universal brother and sisterhood, opposition to the death penalty, and respect for the environment, I think such efforts deserve a fair hearing in theosophical forums, as has been done in various Masonic circles. Below are a selection of some of the more comprehensive, substantial writings on her favoured aspects of Christianity. For a more specialized study, see New Testament Commentaries of H.P. Blavatsky, Henk J. Spierenburg, 1987. 
 
Regarding on oft-posted quote on the internet:"Our goal is not to restore Hinduism, but to wipe Christianity off the face of the earth." - Declaration of Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, The Medium and Daybreak, London, 01/1893, P.23 in "Theosophism: History of a pseudo-religion", René Guénon. The quote in question is a second-hand account of a supposed comment that she made orally. It is highly doubtful that she actually said that. The person and the source are not very credible, and was published after her death. Also, Antoine Faivre in works such as Access to Western Esotericism (1994), bucked the trend of the largely Guénon -inspired negative approach to Theosophy in French publishing and presented Theosophy in a more articulate and positive light. Furthermore, William Quinn's 1997 The Only Tradition convincingly pointed out the salient problems of historical accuracy in Guénon’s 1921 Théosophisme (111-114).One can also consult Theosophy and Theosophism: Response to a Criticism of Theosophy by René Guénon written by Paul Bertrand a pseudonym of Georges Méautis. http://hypatia.gr/fota/images/newsletter/Fota_Newsletter_Special_Ed_Autumn2016.pdf
 

1- In the first chapter of Isis Unveiled, vol. 2, she gives some initial social critiques of Christianity based on reports of various contemporary churches.

Chapter 1 Christianity’s relation to Spiritualism and Paganism

(The Church! Where is it?”) 

1- Christianity’s attitude towards paganism and spiritualism (p.1)

2- Origin of Christian belief in the Devil and Hell (10)

3- Christianity’s relation to the Supernatural (16)

4- The attitude of Science and Comparative Religion to Spiritualism (25)

5- India and Paganism as source of Christian theology (The logos, the Trinity, the Eucharist) (30)

6- Christianity’s struggles with Gnostics and Neoplatonists (51)

https://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/isis/iu2-01.htm

 

2- Lucifer to the Archbishop of Canterbury, Greeting!
Quite a clear, concise, eloquent critique of the Anglican church, which was widely distributed in pamphlet form, and is probably the best overall example of her views on Christianity.
[Lucifer, Vol. I, No. 4, December, 1887, pp. 242-251] Collected Writings, Vol. 8, pp. 268-283
 
3- From Lucifer to a Few Readers
[Lucifer, Vol. II, No. 7, March, 1888, pp. 68-71] Collected Writings vol. 9, pp. 80-86
An interesting follow-up to the previous article. 'Let them turn every cathedral and church into hospitals, refuges, homes for the homeless, and secular schools; and teach people daily morality instead of incomprehensible dogmas.' H. P.Blavatsky CW9, 85
 
4- Notes on Abbé Roca’s ‘Esotericism of Christian Dogma’
[Le Lotus, Paris, Vol. II, No. 9, December, 1887, pp. 160-173] Collected Writings, Vol. 8, pp. 372-391
One of the more extensive debates which Blavatsky engaged in, with someone from the French Christian occultism movement of the day, of the type of Fabre d’Olivet and Éliphas Lévi, dealing mainly with ever-recurring questions of millennialism. One of her most candid and detailed expositions on Christian theosophy.
 
5- Reply to Mistaken Conceptions of the Abbé Roca
[Le Lotus, Paris, Vol. II, No. 13, April, 1888, pp. 3-19] Collected Writings, Vol. 9, pp. 216-237
 
6- The Origin of the Gospels and the Bishop of Bombay
[The Theosophist, Vol. IV, No. 1, October, 1882, pp. 6-9] Collected Writings, Vol. 4, pp. 232-242
Responds to a debate on divorce and re-marriage, with historical discussions about the origins of the New Testament, quoting Church fathers.
 
7- The Sign of the Times
[Lucifer, Vol. I, No. 2, October, 1887, pp. 83-89] Collected Writings, Vol. 8, pp. 98-108
Discussing the presence of occultism in literature and the press, she mentions the case of the Roman Catholic priest Urbain Grandier (1590-1634) who was accused of practising witchcraft at Loudun (Vienne, France), in 1632.
 
8- The Esoteric Character of the Gospels 
[Lucifer, Vol. I, No. 3, November, 1887, pp. 173-180] Collected Writings, Vol. 8, pp. 172-217
Began as an ambitious series of articles that was not completed. Like Jacob Boehme, she criticizes mainstream Christianity in favor of mystical Christianity, and thus favors a symbolic understand of scriptures and emphasizes how the life of Christ exemplifies an inner process of self-transformation related to symbols of spiritual initiation, and she emphasizes the universal aspect of these symbols, following mainly Gerald Massey. This texts deals largely with an erudite exegesis of the word, Christ, ''Christos''. Certain aspects have influenced modern New Age Christianity.
 
9- The Crucifixion of Man
[Lucifer, Vol. II, No. 9, May, 1888, pp. 243-250] Collected Writings, Vol. 9, pp. 264-275
Commentary on an article comparing Prometheus to the crucifixion of Christ, with references to the work of  J. Ralston Skinner.
 
10- Christian Lecturers on Buddhism, and Plain Facts about the same, by Buddhists
[Lucifer. Vol. II, No. 8, April, 1888, pp. 142-149] Collected Writings, Vol. 9, pp.142-154
Commenting on a lecture by Monier Monier-Williams, Blavatsky defends Buddhism using statistics and sources such as Chinese Buddhism, Joseph Edkins.
 
11- Star-Angel Worship in the Roman Catholic Church
[Lucifer, Vol. II, No. 11, July, 1888, pp. 355-365] Collected Writings,Vol. 10, pp.13-32
An esoteric commentary on the worship of the seven archangels and the story of the temple of Seven Spirits, especially built for them by Michelangelo: the famous church known as “St. Mary of the Angels.”, the Basilica of St. Mary of the Angels and of the Martyrs.

12- The Roots of Ritualism in Church and Masonry,
[Lucifer, Vol. IV, Nos. 19 and 21, March, 1889, pp. 32-44, and May, 1889, pp. 226-36] Collected Writings, Vol. 11, pp. 62-101
Another uncompleted ambitious series of articles, a comparative study of the esoteric and pagan roots of Christian ritual, referencing writers such as Jean-Marie Ragon. She contends that “The Initiates took perhaps the hint, and thus joining nolens volens the followers of the new faith, then becoming all domineering, acted accordingly. Some hellenized Jewish Gnostics did the same; and thus more than one “Clemens Alexandrinus”—a convert to all appearance, an ardent Neo-Platonist and the same philosophical pagan at heart—became the instructor of ignorant Christian Bishops. In short the convert malgré lui blended the two external mythologies, the old and the new, and while giving out the compound to the masses, kept the sacred truths for himself.’
 
13- Commentary on the Pistis-Sophia
A lengthy, fragmentary commentary on Gnostic mysticism thatis remarkably original and insightful.
[Lucifer April, 1890, to April, 1891] H.P. Blavatsky, Collected Writings, Vol. 13, p. 1 http://www.katinkahesselink.net/blavatsky/articles/v13/ps_13.htm
 
14- Notes on the Gospel According to John 
[Lucifer, Vol. XI, No. 66, February, 1893, pp. 449-456] Collected Writings,Vol. 11, pp. 482-503
An esoteric and mystical commentary, notably on the opening verses and the wedding at Cana. Since there is an unusual amount of commentary on the Greek text, one can surmise a possible assistance from GRS Mead.
 
PS -  sound bite for her views on Christianity: 'Let them turn every cathedral and church into hospitals, refuges, homes for the homeless, and secular schools; and teach people daily morality instead of incomprehensible dogmas.' H. P. Blavatsky, CW v. 9, p. 85 [Lucifer, March, 1888]